Risk Assessment of Contaminants in Traditional Food Sources
Science Centres: Freshwater and Estuaries, Te Kūwaha
Gathering, eating and sharing wild kai (food) has always been a very important part of Māori culture and wellbeing - this research project aimed to characterise the risks associated with consuming kai collected from rivers, lakes and coastlines.
Gathering, eating and sharing wild kai (food) has always been a very important part of Māori culture and wellbeing.
A broad range of traditional kai sources are still harvested from freshwater and coastal environments and include fish, shellfish, crustaceans and plants. Historically, this kai has been gathered and eaten in large quantities, but recently these foods have become increasingly susceptible to human-generated contaminants. Potentially toxic contaminants include heavy metals in stormwater, pesticides from agriculture and naturally occurring heavy metals such as mercury and arsenic, which, are associated with geothermal activity.
Working in partnership with the iwi from the Rotorua and Temuka regions, our research aimed to characterise the risks associated with consuming kai collected from rivers, lakes and coastlines. Our research partners included the Te Arawa Lakes Trust, Te Runanga o Arowhenua and Tipa & Associates. We focused on those contaminants that bioaccumulate, such as organochlorine pesticides (DDTs, dieldrin and lindane), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), pentachlorophenol and dioxins, as well as heavy metals such as mercury, arsenic, cadmium, lead, copper and zinc. Such contaminants may be derived from industrial or agricultural applications, urbanisation. In addition, mercury and arsenic are found at elevated levels in geothermal regions.
The impact of environmental contamination on the resident wild kai, and in turn, on Māori iwi/hapū consuming them, has not been investigated to date. A review of wild food in New Zealand identified gaps in knowledge of risk of consuming non-commercial wild-caught foods, especially in terms of consumption levels (and hence exposure).
This research, funded by the Health Research Council over a three year period, ultimately aimed to improve Māori health by identifying, quantifying, and effectively communicating the risks associated with the collection and consumption of wild kai.
There were four main components to the research:
- We interviewed key informants and undertook a survey to identify what important kai species are harvested and eaten by iwi members, and from what aquatic environments they are currently sourced
- We identified the types and levels of contaminants present in the wild kai and associated habitats identified by Māori
- We established potential pathways of contaminant bioaccumulation via the food web utilising methyl mercury as an example of a bioaccumulative contaminant
- We identified the potential health risks associated with the collection and consumption of contaminated wild kai, and developed risk consumption advice specifically targeted at Māori.
In this study we've documented kai gathering, processing and consumption patterns from iwi participants (current and historic patterns). From this we can conclude that there has been a substantial change in kai gathering behaviours. This is particularly evident in the change in local consumption rates for a variety of kai species that we've quantified. For example, only 13% of the total fish consumption by Te Arawa and Arowhenua participants is derived from the wild, with the remainder being store-bought. We've explored cultural and societal barriers to current day collection practices.
Development of quantitative food chain
We've developed a quantitative food chain model for mercury biomagnification in the Te Arawa lakes, showing that risk of exposure to higher levels of mercury increases with decreasing water quality (in part due to shorter food chains in more polluted lakes).
The relationship that has been identified between mercury uptake, food chain length and trophic status of lakes differs from what has been found for other temperate lakes internationally, where mercury uptake is generally lower in more eutrophic lakes. This research was undertaken to determine potential pathways of exposure for kai gatherers and whether this differed in response to a major ecosystem driver, namely eutrophication. This knowledge increases our understanding of factors which may increase risk associated with kai consumption.
Indicative kai consumption guidelines
We've converted this contaminant information into indicative kai consumption guidelines to inform existing kai gathering practices, as well as to feed into management strategies for customary fisheries.
We've done this by undertaking quantitative, additive risk assessments using US EPA protocols for multiple species and locations. We've derived indicative acceptable consumption rates (numbers of meals/month) for multiple species, across all sites and on a site-by-site basis, using both cancer and non-cancer health endpoints and lifetime exposure. For Te Arawa, these consumption guidelines will be valuable in extending the scope of species management plans to include limits based on human health considerations.
This risk may be associated with naturally occurring bioaccumulative contaminants (such as mercury and arsenic from geothermally-influenced lakes) and also with legacy contaminants such as DDT, which were historically used, especially in rural areas.
Management of the contaminant source is therefore impractical in some cases. However, this information will assist health officials and community groups to educate people and make them aware of the increased risks and associated safe consumption practices. This will need to occur on an ongoing basis. Such management will need to be flexible to account for emerging contaminants, which represent another potential legacy.
Te Arawa Lakes Trust http://www.tearawa.iwi.nz/
New Zealand Food Safety Authority http://www.foodsafety.govt.nz/
Phillips N, Stewart M, Olsen G., Hickey C (2011) Contaminants in Kai – Te Arawa rohe. Part 1: Data Report. Prepared for Te Arawa Lakes Trust and Health Research Council of New Zealand. NIWA Client Report: HAM2011-021, March 2011, NIWA Project: HRC08201. 69pp.
Phillips N, Stewart M, Olsen G., Hickey C (2011) Contaminants in Kai – Te Arawa rohe. Part 2: Risk Assessment Report. Prepared for Te Arawa Lakes Trust and Health Research Council of New Zealand. NIWA Client Report: HAM2011-023, March 2011, NIWA Project: HRC08201. 81pp.
Phillips N, Stewart M, Olsen G, Hickey C, Tipa G (2011) Risk assessment of contaminants in kai from the Te Arawa rohe – summary report. June 2011.
Phillips N, Stewart M, Olsen G, Hickey C, Tipa G (2011) Risk assessment of contaminants in kai from the Arowhenua rohe – summary report. June 2011.
Stewart M, Olsen G, Phillips N, Hickey C (2010) Contaminants in kai – Arowhenua rohe Part 1: Data Report. Report to Te Runanga o Arowhenua & Health Research Council of New Zealand. October 2010 HAM2010-105. 78pp.
Stewart M, Phillips N, Hickey C, Olsen G (2010) Contaminants in kai – Arowhenua rohe Part 2: Risk Assessment. Report to Te Runanga o Arowhenua & Health Research Council of New Zealand. October 2010 HAM2010-116. 74pp.
Tipa G, Nelson K, Emery W , Smith H , Phillips N (2010) A survey of wild kai consumption in the Te Arawa rohe. Report prepared for Te Arawa Lakes Trust & Health Research Council of New Zealand . August 2010. HAM2010-096. 171pp.
Tipa G, Nelson K, Downs S, Home M, Phillips N (2010) A survey of wild kai consumption in the Arowhenua rohe . Report prepared for Te Runanga o Arowhenua & Health Research Council of New Zealand . August 2010. HAM2010-098. 120pp
Stewart M, Phillips NR, Olsen G, Hickey CW, Tipa G. (2011) Organochlorines and heavy metals in wild caught food as a potential human health risk to the indigenous Maori population of South Canterbury, New Zealand. Science of the Total Environment 409: 2029-2039.
For further information contact:
Dr Ngaire Phillips